![]() |
Ethical communications - at what cost? |
Some time ago,
my good friend and fellow trainer Tony Charlesworth and I found ourselves in Sarajevo at the request
of the UNHCR to give tips on media work to lawyers working with people trying
to recover their property as they returned to their homes after the war. The
lawyers, quite rightly, needed to know how to attract journalists to their
story, with the benign aim of reaching out through the newspapers, radio and
television screens to their prospective clients.
Prepping before
the visit, I asked what the best media channel was in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
and got the unsurprising answer that it was television. I protested that radio
was usually a quicker route (these were definitely the days Before
Facebook), but they explained that as a vast majority of the population was
unemployed and stuck in front of the screen for most of the day, then the goggle
box was definitely the best way to go.
Then they
shocked me. How, they asked, could they afford the price they had to pay to get
a story on TV?
Hold on a
minute, are we talking advertising? No, they replied, we need to pay
journalists to carry stories.
Two days of
media training later, I was pretty sure that the lawyers would have good enough
material to attract the hacks. They’d learnt how to create a message, how to
find a human story, and how to get a reporter to respond.
I never did
learn how they fared after the second session, but I left with the assumption
that the journalists of Bosnia
and Herzegovina were in the same learning
curve as others in South East Europe, and that as the people with the stories
became wiser about how to present themselves, then the journalists too would
start to professionalise. BBC, Thompson, Reuters and Deutschwelle were beginning
their outreach into the area, and my hopes for change were high.
This week,
joining the PRO.PR conference in Maribor, and finding myself back on the
Balkans Beat after a gap of nearly seven years, I was taken aback to hear my early experiences echoed from the conference floor. B & H is now seeing its
own wave of young PR professionals coming to the fore, and they too are
bemoaning the need to pay journalist to run stories.
So much has changed in the country: the
independent Communications Regulatory Agency is now in place; a press code has
been adopted, along with a press council; libel and defamation has been
decriminalised; a Freedom of Access to Information Law has been passed and what
was once a state-owned broadcaster is now a public service broadcasting system. Many of the people who want to work with journalists now know how to present a story so that it appeals, and would never dream of using money as a bargaining chip.Yet the tradition of stories for favours still remains, and partisan journalism is still in evidence.
But hang on a minute, who am I to judge? My own country, once happy to preach to the countries of south east Europe, is now mired in phone-tapping revelations; the Germans are just recovering from a scandal involving the media that brought down their president; and there are almost daily exposes into the antics of political spin doctors all over Europe.
Who can take the moral high ground? It looks like communications ethics is really ripe for review in Europe!
No comments:
Post a Comment